Olaf Pieczkowski vs Calvin Mueller Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Nov at 09:32 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
O. Pieczkowski vs C. Mueller

POL
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Pieczkowski 1 - 0 Mueller
They have played 2 sets in total, with Olaf Pieczkowski winning 2 and Calvin Mueller winning 0. The last match between Olaf Pieczkowski and Calvin Mueller was at the M25 Manama, 13-11-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Olaf Pieczkowski getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pieczkowski | 1 |
| Mueller | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Manama(11-13-25)
O. Pieczkowski vs C. Mueller H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.64% (132-97) | Career Total W/L | 72.00% (18-7) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
O. Pieczkowski vs C. Mueller Match Preview:
- Olaf Pieczkowski is currently achieving a slightly better second serve win percentage at 46.13% compared to Calvin Mueller's 43.45%. Could this small edge be crucial in their head-to-head match?
- When it comes to returning second serves, Pieczkowski seems slightly superior, winning 46.83% of these points, whereas Mueller trails behind at 40.14%.
- Interestingly, Mueller outperforms Pieczkowski on first serve returns, securing 29.16% of points, over Pieczkowski's 25.82%. Could this balanced performance be pivotal?
- Under pressure, Mueller has shown a stronger ability to save breakpoints with a rate of 59.21%, while Pieczkowski saves them at 55.94%—an aspect worth monitoring during the match.
- Within the past year, Mueller has a superior win percentage, dominating 78.26% of matches as opposed to Pieczkowski's 57.14%. Does this indicate overall higher form?
- Analyzing surface preferences, Pieczkowski excels on Clay with a 57% win ratio, while Mueller's 57% success comes on Hard courts. Might surface influence the outcome?
- Pieczkowski's experience often occurs at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level with a 67.50% success rate, whereas Mueller shows an impressive 78.26% at the same level. Does this suggest Mueller is better prepared in similar settings?
- Mueller has faced better-ranked opponents, averaging 272.74, unlike Pieczkowski, who has competed against players ranked around 357.35. Could this reflect Mueller's competitive edge?
- In decisive moments during matches, Mueller significantly excels, winning 80% of deciding sets, compared to Pieczkowski's 38%. Might this be a deciding factor if the match is closely contested?
- For break point conversion, Mueller maintains a slight advantage, converting 31.87% of opportunities, whereas Pieczkowski converts 29.21%. How might this capability tip the balance during vital moments?
Editorial Prediction (November 12, 2025, UTC):
As we anticipate the upcoming match between Olaf Pieczkowski and Calvin Mueller, several key statistics provide insights into potential outcomes.
Pieczkowski exhibits slightly better returns on second serve points and has considerable experience on Clay, whereas Mueller displays a high match-win percentage and strength in decisive sets. Additionally, Mueller's ability to face higher-ranked opponents and his slight edge in break point conversion offer him an advantage.
Considering these factors, Mueller appears to have a stronger overall performance and demonstrated resilience under pressure. Consequently, Calvin Mueller is likely to emerge victorious in this encounter.
Olaf Pieczkowski vs Calvin Mueller Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
O. Pieczkowski vs C. Mueller H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:13:51 | Average Match Time | 1:13:51 |
| 61% (25/41) | 1st Serve % | 63% (24/38) |
| 72% (18/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 69% (11/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (4/14) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 61% (23/38) | Return Points Win % | 29% (12/41) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
O. Pieczkowski Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
QF | W | 7-5 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
F | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
C. Mueller Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 4-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 4-6 6-1 10-6 | ||

O. Pieczkowski vs C. Mueller Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.64% (132/97) | YTD Win/Loss | 72.00% (18/7) |
| 56.73% (291/222) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.33% (38/22) |
| 52.22% (2443/2235) | Games Win/Loss | 55.89% (332/262) |
| 58.16% (82/59) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 57.14% (40/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 55.56% (10/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 82.35% (14/3) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 593 | Aces Total | 47 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 709 | Total Double Faults | 24 |
| 1:37:32 | Average Match Time | 1:24:44 |
| 459 | Average Opponent Rank | 47.28 |
| 61% (8260/13571) | 1st Serve % | 70% (942/1350) |
| 68% (5614/8260) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (636/942) |
| 48% (2542/5310) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (228/408) |
| 46% (675/1483) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (53/137) |
| 42% (5704/13699) | Return Points Win % | 39% (529/1345) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.24% (19/23) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60.44% (110/72) | Futures W/L | 72.00% (18/7) |
| 57% (129/225) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 72% (18/25) |
| 55% (30/55) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (6/9) |
| 48% (29/60) | Deciding Set Win % | 80% (8/10) |
| 87% (135/117) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (13/11) |
| 13% (135/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (13/2) |
| 15% (93/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 58% (12/7) |